Legal Opinion

Park v. Ensign

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 1, 1901No. 753PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Johnson district court; John T. Burris, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wells, J. :

Daniel Ensign brought suit against the plaintiffs in error, D. B. Park and S. R. Park, for the sum of $232.10, as a balance due on a promissory note, given for rent of land. In their answer, the defendants admitted the execution of the note, but alleged lack of consideration, and damage by reason of the fences around said rented land having been torn down by the road overseer, and said Daniel Ensign refusing to rebuild or allow them to be rebuilt, and prayed judgment in their favor for $600. The plaintiff filed a general denial in reply.

Pendi…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wills v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. McKean v. MasseySupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  3. Clary v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hutchings v. WinsorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Leon Gabai, Inc. v. KrakovitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Barry v. HolmesleyArizona Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API