Legal Opinion

Goforth v. Cohen

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided October 8, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 68-377PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

Matter before the court is one for summary judgment sought by defendant Secretary’s motion.

Claimant opposes the motion and seeks a determination that she is entitled to a period of disability pursuant to Section 216(i) of the Social Security Act and disability benefits under Section 223.

The claimant filed her application for benefits on February 3, 1967 alleging arthritis of the spine as her disabling condition. She was notified on April 3, *5911967 of the denial of her claim. Reconsideration was sought but notice of denial was sent to claimant on December 6,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blanscet v. RibicoffDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1962
  2. Sage v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1965
  3. Crowder v. GardnerDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schlabach v. Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1978
  2. Bishop v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1974
  3. Scott v. CalifanoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
  4. Rodriguez v. RichardsonDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1971
  5. Dean v. CalifanoDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API