Legal Opinion

Mogayzel v. Texas Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 28, 2002No. 2-00-409-CVPublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIXON W. HOLMAN, Justice.

Appellants Kathy Mogayzel, Karen Roop, and Christi Callender appeal from the trial court’s decision to grant a motion to dismiss their case for lack of jurisdiction. In their sole point, Appellants argue that the trial court erred in granting the motion to dismiss on grounds that Appellants’ claims are barred by the sovereign immunity of the State and the Texas Department of Transportation (“TxDOT”). We affirm.

Factual and PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On June 14, 1999, Andrew Mogayzel (“Andy”), who was Kathy Mogayzel’s husband, was driving westbound on interstate…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Texas Department of Transportation v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Federal Sign v. Texas Southern UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. City of Fort Worth v. CrockettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. City of Mission v. Cantu, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  3. Quorum International v. Tarrant Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Gibson v. Dynegy Midstream Services, L.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. Texas Department of Transportation v. Olivares, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API