Legal Opinion

City of Fort Worth v. Crockett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 29, 2004No. 2-03-297-CVPublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

JOHN CAYCE, Chief Justice.

We withdraw our prior opinion and judgment and substitute the following. We deny Crockett’s motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc.

In this recreational use case, the primary issue we must decide is whether the City of Fort Worth has waived its immunity from a suit by Craig Crockett, a recreational user of a bike path in a city park, for the City’s alleged failure to fully barricade a dangerous condition on the bike path. Because we conclude that the City’s immunity from suit has not been waived, we will vacate the trial court’s order denying…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. County of Cameron v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Texas Bay Cherry Hill, L.P. v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  3. City of Arlington v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  4. Vantage Systems Design, Inc. v. Raymondville Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  5. Allen "F" Calton v. Steve Schiller, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2016

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API