Legal Opinion
JONES v. JONES.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
27 P. 85
1 Colo.App. 28
JONES
v.
JONES.
Court of Appeals of Colorado
June 30, 1891
Error to Arapahoe county court.
[1 Colo.App. 29] Caypless, Keeler & Sales, for plaintiff in error.
G.M. Allen, for defendant in error.
RICHMOND, P.J.
In this action plaintiff, Rebecca Jones, sought to recover of defendant, H.F. Jones, a certain sum of money claimed to be due under contract between them. Prior to the 29th of November, A.D.1876, plaintiff and defendant were husband and wife, and on that day articles of separation were entered into, whereby H.F. Jones obligated himself to pay to Rebecca Jones certain sums of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Clark, Trustee, Etc. v. . FosdickNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Pettit v. PettitNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Carey v. MackeySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1890
- Haight v. . Board of Supervisors of Saratoga CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Appleby v. Estates of ApplebySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Lucht's Concrete Pumping, Inc. v. HornerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Troutman v. WebsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Compass Bank v. KoneColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Gilleland v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.