Legal Opinion
Matter of Beneky v. Waterfront Comm'n of New York Harbor
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1977PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. Petitioner, an investigator for the Waterfront Commission, concedes that he met with a reputed organized crime figure, who had been a target of numerous investigations by the commission, and that this meeting did not occur in the regular course of his employer’s business. As a nontenured employee, petitioner was not entitled to a full adversary hearing concerning the reasons for the termination of his employment unless there was proof that the discharge was for an improper reason or in bad faith. (See, e.g.,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Codd v. VelgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- MATTER OF BERGSTEIN v. Bd. of Educ.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Anonymous v. CoddNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ause v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Prasad v. MergesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Matter of Dillin v. Waterfront Commn. of N.Y. HarborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Pelaez v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Shih v. Waterfront CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.