Legal Opinion

State v. Qualls

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2012No. 2011-0202PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Qualls, 131 Ohio St.3d 499,

2012-Ohio-1111.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. QUALLS, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Qualls, 131 Ohio St.3d 499,

2012-Ohio-1111.] Criminal law—Postrelease control—When a defendant is notified about postrelease control at the sentencing hearing, but notification is inadvertently omitted from the sentencing entry, the omission can be corrected with a nunc pro tunc entry and the defendant is not entitled to a new sentencing hearing. (No. 2011-0202—Submitted October 5, 2011—Decided March 20, 2012.) CERTIFIED BY the Court of Appeals for Meigs County,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. LesterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. SimpkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Randlett v. LynchOhio Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API