HARRIS v. RICARDO
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ALTERIK HARRIS, Plaintiff, aintiti, Civil Action No. 23-1870 (KMW) (MIS) v OPINION JAMES RICARDO, et al., Defendants. WILLIAMS, District Judge: This matter comes before the Court on the Court’s sua sponte screening of Plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. 1) and the Court’s review of Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No, 1-1.) Having reviewed the application, this Court finds that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is warranted in this matter, and Plaintiffs application will be granted. Because Plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Kelley Mala v. Crown Bay MarinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Michael Malik Allah v. Thomas SeiverlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Cheryl James v. Wilkes Barre CityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.