Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Goldman

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 10, 1992No. 78,517PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSEN, Vice Chief Judge:

Appellants seek review of the trial court’s order imposing sanctions for failure to comply with the court’s discovery order. The sanctions included, among other things, dismissal of Appellant Alfred Goldman’s counterclaims. We reverse and remand.

*183This action arises from a dispute between two brothers, Appellant Alfred Goldman (Alfred), and Appellee Monte Goldman (Monte), over their respective interests in the considerable property acquired by their father, who is now deceased. To minimize the tax consequences of transfer of this property to his sons, the father…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Hill v. Pierce Mobile Homes, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goldman v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API