Legal Opinion
Blankenship v. Blankenship
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 7, 1963No. Civ. 20199, 20494PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
In this action for divorce two appeals have been taken by the plaintiff and cross-defendant husband. The appeal in No. 20199 involves the separate and community character of certain property of the parties, the division of the community property, the imposition of liens thereon and the award of alimony and attorneys’ fees. The appeal in No. 20494 involves the award of attorneys’ fees and costs on appeal.
The plaintiff, Elmer F. Blankenship, and the defendant, Gladys M. Blankenship, were married on November 11, 1933. They separated on June 3, 1955. There are no children.
The plaintiff commenced…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Thomasset v. ThomassetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Estate of NeilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Golden v. GoldenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Lovetro v. SteersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Millington v. MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Hansen v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Beck v. BeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.