Legal Opinion
United States v. Baugh
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 25, 1999No. 98-10224PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge SCHROEDER; Concurrence by Judge SILVERMAN.
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:
Pamela Baugh and other members of a group called Religious Witness with Homeless People (“RWHP”) appeal their convictions for demonstrating without a permit on National Park property, in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 2.51(a). At the time of their arrest, the defendants were protesting the Park Service’s plan to demolish the Wherry housing in the Presidio in San Francisco instead of using the units to house the homeless.
The defendants challenge the constitutional validity of the permit regulation and its…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Menotti v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Santa Monica Food Not Bombs v. City of Santa MonicaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Clark v. City of LakewoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Galvin v. HayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Long Beach Area Peace v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.