Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Edgerly

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 9, 1983PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The defendant appeals from his conviction of murder in the first degree, arguing that he was deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial and that the judge committed errors in the course of his trial. We affirm the conviction and find no reason to grant relief under G. L. c. 278, § 33E.

The circumstances of the crime are not essential to an understanding of the appellate issues. It is sufficient to note that the defendant was convicted of the murder of Frank Smith, an area service manager for the General Motors Corporation. There was evidence that the defendant, who had been…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. BradshawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LaniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  2. State v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. Fogarty v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. ShraiarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API