Legal Opinion

In Re Rauser

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 28, 2004No. 19-20219PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO DEBTOR’S FOURTH AMENDED SCHEDULE C

LORRAINE MURPHY WEIL, Bankruptcy Judge.

The matter before the court is the chapter 7 trustee’s (the “Trustee”) Partial Objection to Debtor’s Claim of Exemption (second [sic] Amended Schedule C) (Doc. I.D. No. 25, the “Objection”). 1 This is a core proceeding within the purview of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b). This memorandum constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of law mandated by Rule 7052 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (made applicable to this contested matter by Rule 9014 of the Federal Rules…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. National Assn. of Railroad PassengersSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. In Re MarcusUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
  3. General Electric Co. Business Lighting Group v. Halmar Distributors, Inc. (In Re Halmar Distributors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  4. In Re ScottiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re McFarlandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API