Legal Opinion

Durrant v. Christensen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1990No. 17678PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYLE, Justice.

Plaintiffs-appellants, Orvil and Faye Durrant and Kenneth W. Sellers, (hereafter “Durrant and Sellers”) bring this appeal challenging an order by the district court *72awarding attorney fees and costs to defendant. The defendant-respondent, cross-appellant, Ruby Christensen, (hereafter “Christensen”) cross-appeals on the issue of denial of certain costs and fees. All parties are residents of Bingham County, Idaho.

Durrant and Sellers are landowners whose irrigation water crosses property owned by L & R Christensen Investments Limited. They filed a complaint against Christensen…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Steve Rodgers v. Lincoln Towing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Anderson v. EthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Gilbert v. City of CaldwellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Baxter v. CraneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. C & G, INC. v. RuleIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Marshall v. BlairIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  5. McKay v. OwensIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API