Legal Opinion

State v. Osteen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1985No. 84-516PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

The State of Montana appeals from an order of the Lincoln County District Court suppressing evidence seized after officers entered the defendant’s home without a warrant and also suppressing defendant’s statements made prior to receiving a Miranda warning. We affirm.

The issues are:

1. Did the District Court err in suppressing evidence seized after officers entered defendant’s home without a warrant?

2. Did the District Court err in suppressing defendant’s statements made prior to receiving Miranda warnings?

Around 10:15 p.m. on April 6, 1984, a man reported to the Lincoln County Sheriffs Office…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BullockMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. LohMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. RushtonMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. StaatMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. WoodsMontana Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API