Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Coalton v. Atkins

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1990No. Case No. 608Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGrey, J.

I agree with overruling all of Atkins' assignments of error, but I dissent on sustaining the village's cross assignment of error.

*111My primary objection is that the claim of error was raised in this court for the first time. An appropriation case is like any other, and if the claim of error is not raised it is waived. Clearly, Atkins' testimony as to damage to the residue was not presented in the proper form, but that is not the issue here. The village did not object to it, and now relies on this as a ground for reversal.

Atkins' testimony as to the damage to the residue was relevant under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CraftOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. State v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Camden v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API