Legal Opinion

Ossining Urban Renewal Agency v. Lord

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1983PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to the Supreme Court to remand to the commissioners of appraisal for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum.

The CPLR 3222 submission constituted a stipulation between the parties of the facts stated in the submission and was conclusive of such facts as between the parties to the proceeding (Mann v Simpson & Co., 286 NY 450). The parties here stipulated that the easement granted to Pine Top in the conveyance to it from Elissa Lord of the 13.68 parcel…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mann v. R. Simpson & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Ossining Urban Renewal Agency v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Campbell v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MATTER OF OSSINING URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API