Legal Opinion

MATTER OF OSSINING URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY v. Lord

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

60 N.Y.2d 845 (1983)

In the Matter of Ossining Urban Renewal Agency, Respondent,

v.

Elissa Lord et al., Defendants, and Pine Top Building Corp., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 20, 1983.

Decided November 3, 1983.

Bernard Gartlir and Judith A. Kaufman for appellant.

Hugh A. Lavery, Jr., for respondent.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur in memorandum.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to the Supreme Court to remand to the commissioners of appraisal for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mann v. R. Simpson & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Ossining Urban Renewal Agency v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Campbell v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Ossining Urban Renewal Agency v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. In re the Estate of CarrollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. New York Telephone Co. v. WadleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Ossining Urban Renewal Agency v. LordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API