Legal Opinion

Kofmehl v. Baseline Lake, LLC

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 12, 2012No. 29683-1-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Siddoway, A.C.J.

¶1 When a purchase and sale agreement is determined to be void under the statute of frauds, the court may grant rescission and award restitution, restoring the parties to their precontractual positions. But a purchaser who relies on the statute of frauds to avoid the contract may not obtain restitution if the vendor is ready, willing, and able to perform as agreed. Home Realty Lynnwood, Inc. v. Walsh, 146 Wn. App. 231, 240, 189 P.3d 253 (2008). This appeal requires that we address an issue not explicitly addressed in prior cases applying this rule, namely, who bears the burden…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1943

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. ShusherebaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  2. Kofmehl v. Baseline Lake, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In re the Estate of: Steven Ward HallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. Kellogg v. ShusherebaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  5. Kofmehl v. Baseline Lake, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API