Legal Opinion

Framingham Homes, Inc. v. Dietz

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 1, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLttmmus, J.

In this case the briefs refer us to G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 40, §§ 42A and 42F, which make charges for water supplied at the request “of the owner or tenant” a lien on the real estate, and give to “an owner of real estate who, in order to prevent the imposition of a hen thereon or to discharge the same, has paid charges for water furnished to a tenant or other person who was bound to pay the same,” a right to recover over from the tenant. See Mechanics Savings Bank v. Collector of Taxes of Holyoke, 299 Mass. 404. But these statutes cannot be considered, for they apply only in municipalities which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bleck v. East Boston Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Brodsky v. FineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. American Steel & Wire Co. v. BearseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Mechanics Savings Bank v. Collector of TaxesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Milliken v. WarwickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Grant v. Aldermen of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. City of Worcester v. HoffmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  4. Baizen v. Board of Public WorksMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API