Legal Opinion

Yee Won v. White

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 12, 1919No. 3259PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the First Division of Northern District of California; Maurice T. Dooling, Judge. Habeas corpus proceeding by Yee Won against Edward White, as Commissioner of Immigration at the Port of San Francisco. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer and denying the writ, petitioner appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

The applicants, Chin Shee, Yee Tuk Oy, and Yee Yuk Uing, wife and minor children of the appellant, Yee Won, arrived at the port of San Francisco, Cal., on the steamship Tjisondari July 16, 1917. They applied for admission to the United States as the wife and minor children, respectively, of Yee Won, who, it is alleged, was a regularly domiciled Chinese merchant and a member of the exempt class. Admission was denied by the Commissioner of Immigration on the ground that the status of Yee Won as a merchant had not been satisfactorily established. On appeal to the Secretary…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nishimura Ekiu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Chin Yow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Lem Moon Sing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Low Wah Suey v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Louie Share Gan v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
  2. United States ex rel. to Ming v. Commissioner of ImmigrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  3. Sugaya v. HaffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  4. Chan Gai Jan v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API