Legal Opinion

American Finance Corporation v. Webb

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 2, 1962No. File No. CV 17-615-297PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellees have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal because no finding was requested or made, and for the further reason that there is no error apparent on the face of the record. It is true that there is no finding. However, the first assignment of error can be resolved by resort to the record alone and without the necessity of a finding. In such a case, a finding is not necessary. Cir. Ct. Rule 7.13.1. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

The first assignment of error is based on the court's conclusion that the note sued upon should have been produced in evidence at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morgan v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Osterlund v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  3. West Phila. N. Bank v. FieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Katz v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. ClarkeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Laurel Bank Trust Co. v. SahadiConnecticut Superior Court · 1975
  3. Malaspina v. IttsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966
  4. Laurel Bank & Trust Co. v. SahadiPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API