Legal Opinion
Milhollan v. Great Northern Railway Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 4, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBubke, J.
On November 17, 1922, the residents of the towns of Ambrose, Fortuna and Colgan, all in the county of Divide, in the State of North Dakota, petitioned the Board of Railroad Commission' ers to take immediate steps to have the Great Northern Railway, and the Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie, hereinafter called the Soo Railway, make physical connections at Crosby, North Dakota, the said railroads being less than a half mile apart at the city of Crosby, and alleging as a reason for such connection that the people living in the said towns were unable to get a supply of North Dakota lignite…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Simpson v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Jay Burns Baking Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Washington Ex Rel. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. FairchildSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Railroad Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.