Legal Opinion

Smilgis v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 1981No. 80-1121PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE HARTMAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff Vito Smilgis brought this action to recover damages against defendants Chicago Transit Authority (hereinafter CTA); its bus driver, Luther McClellan; the city of Chicago (hereinafter defendant); and Delfino Bustos, a Chicago police officer. Plaintiff was injured when struck by an unmarked Chicago police car as he crossed the street after exiting and crossing in front of a CTA bus. A jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor and against the city of Chicago for $130,000, and answered in the negative a special…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Saldana v. Wirtz Cartage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bruske v. ArnoldIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Wicks v. Cuneo-Henneberry Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Eshelman v. RawaltIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Wozniak v. SegalIllinois Supreme Court · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chavez v. WattsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. LaPook v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Kenny Construction Co. v. Hinsdale Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Price v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API