Bautista v. Juul Labs, Inc.

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARIA DE LA LUZ BAUTISTA-PEREZ, Case No. 20-cv-01613-HSG et al., 8 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO Plaintiffs, DISMISS 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 82 10 JUUL LABS, INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant Juul Labs, Inc.’s (“JLI”) motion to dismiss (Dkt. 14 No. 79, “Motion”) Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 78, “FAC”).1 For the following 15 reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion with leave to amend as to the claims against JLI.2 16 I. BACKGROUND 17 On July 3, 2019, the Coalition for Reasonable…