Legal Opinion

Roe v. Mayorkas

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 2, 2024No. 1:22-cv-10808Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS * RASUL ROE, et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * * Civil Action No. 22-cv-10808-ADB ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., * * Defendants. * * * * MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BURROUGHS, D.J. Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for completion and/or supplementation of the administrative record, [ECF No. 90]. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural Background After ruling on Defendants’ motion to dismiss on April 28, 2023, the Court ordered Defendants to produce the “complete,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API