Rose v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Tyack, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Norman Rose (“appellant”), appeals from the judgment of the Ohio Court of Claims granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (“ODRC”). Appellant’s appeal arises out of his removal as the warden of the Richland Correctional Institution (“RiCI”). The following facts are taken from the complaint and the parties’ summary judgment materials.
{¶ 2} Appellant began his employment with ODRC in 1984 as a classified civil servant. In 1994, he accepted an unclassified position as a warden. In August…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State ex rel. Grady v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Johnson v. Am. Italian Golf Assn. of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Wilmington Savings Fund Society v. SalahuddinOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Williams v. Am. Homes 4 Rent Mgt. Holdings, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Erickson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Kraft v. OMCO Building, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.