Legal Opinion

People v. Fordyce

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1966No. Calendar 3, Docket 51,085PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon this appeal, defendant claims (1) a right to be advised of an absolute constitutional right to remain silent and (2) a right to be advised of the right to counsel at the time when he was being held after arrest and prior to judicial proceedings charging him with breaking and entering in the nighttime with intent to commit a larceny. CL 1948, § 750.110 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.305). The larceny occurred about 3 a.m., September 9, 1963. Defendant was found in the building. Although Fordyce was advised any statement must be voluntary and could be used against him, he was not advised of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. People v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. FarmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. MaxsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. ShirkMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. LamboMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. People v. SchraderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API