Legal Opinion

Hill v. Bloom

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2010No. S-13338PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOWERS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

On February 20, 2008, following an eviden-tiary hearing, the superior court calculated the future child support obligations that Allison Hill owed to Deborah Bloom. The court used a five-year average of Hill's income from 2002 to 2006 to calculate child support for 2008 forward. The court rejected Hill's argument that her substantially reduced 2007 income should be the basis of her future child support obligations and expressly found her reduced 2007 income to be an "aberration." Hill did not appeal the court's child support order.

Five months after the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Curley v. CurleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Patch v. PatchAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Bunn v. HouseAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Morino v. SwaymanAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Flannery v. FlanneryAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilhour v. WilhourAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Limeres v. LimeresAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Schwier v. SchwierAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Limeres v. LimeresAlaska Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API