Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Mauerman v. SUP'R CT. FOR THURSTON CTY.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1954No. 32875PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlson, J.

— Is the petitioner in a proceeding to modify the child custody provisions of a divorce decree entitled to a change of judges from the judge who entered that decree, upon filing a motion and affidavit of prejudice in compliance with Rem. Rev. Stat., § 209-1, and Rem. Supp. 1941, § 209-2 (codified with slight changes in RCW 4.12.040, 4.12.050) ?

Respondent’s return shows the following facts: After a trial before respondent judge, relator and her former husband were divorced by a decree entered July 1, 1953. This decree deprived relator of the custody of a minor child. March 22, 1954, she filed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. MacRi v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State ex rel. Lefebvre v. CliffordWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Luellen v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Benedict v. Board of Police Pension Fund CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Bedolfe v. BedolfeWashington Supreme Court · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Lambert v. LambertWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Leitner v. LonabaughWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. BelgardeWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Marine Power & Equipment Co. v. Department of TransportationWashington Supreme Court · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API