Legal Opinion

Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company v. Kowalski

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 22, 2023No. 3:21-cv-06469Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT 10 INSURANCE COMPANY, Case No. 21-cv-06469-RS 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR 12 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 13 HAILI KOWALSKI, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 This interpleader action turns on one central question: which of the parties is entitled to the 18 proceeds of a $493,000 life insurance policy? Haili Kowalski and Marilyn Valois, both Co- 19 Defendants and Cross-Claimants, have brought cross-motions for summary judgment to resolve 20 this question. Valois argues…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. 21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1341, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23937j Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Julie A. Marsh, Dana Lyn Weaver and James R. Marsh, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. Apple Computer, Inc. v. Articulate Systems, Inc., Defendant-Cross v. Dragon Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Rose Marie Wheaton, and Douglas Wheaton and Daniel WheatonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Shirley W. Stewart v. Thorpe Holding Company Profit Sharing Plan, Thomas A. Carpenter, Thorpe Holding CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Haynes International, Inc. v. Jessop Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API