Legal Opinion

Rothschild v. Boelter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1872PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In “ proceedings supplementary to tbe execution,” upon tbe examination of tbe defendant, an order was made requiring bim to turn over to a receiver a certain silver watch and chain, his property, and in his possession, and all other property not exempt, the proceeds to be applied in payment of the judgment. Defendant moved in the district court for Olmsted county, for an order vacating so much of said order as required him to turn over said watch and chain.

Read the full summary

In “ proceedings supplementary to tbe execution,” upon tbe examination of tbe defendant, an order was made requiring bim to turn over to a receiver a certain silver watch and chain, his property, and in his possession, and all other property not exempt, the proceeds to be applied in payment of the judgment. Defendant moved in the district court for Olmsted county, for an order vacating so much of said order as required him to turn over said watch and chain. The motion was denied, and defendant appeals to this court from the order denying the same.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Ripley, Ch. J.

The defendant upon supplementary proceedings was required to turn over to a receiver, a .certain silver watch and chain, his property and in his possession. He claims that it was exempt from execution under Gen. Stat. ch. 66, sec. 279.

We do not think that this is so.

Giving him the benefit of the statement in his brief as to what appeared upon his examination, (although it is not before us on this appeal) it is “ that defendant had a silver watch worth $40 or $50, which he wore as part of his apparel, and used to keep the time at his house and of the workmen whom he…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. In Re MimsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985
  3. Strong v. LynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. Brown v. EdmondsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Coffinberry v. MaddenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API