Legal Opinion

In Re Anderson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 2, 1994No. 93-8312PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Per curiam

Pro se petitioner Grant Anderson seeks an extraordinary writ pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 2241 and requests permission to proceed in forma pauperis under this Court’s Rule 39. Pursuant to Rule 39.8, we deny petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis* Petitioner is allowed until May 23, 1994, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38 and to submit his petition in compliance with this Court’s Rule 33. For the reasons explained below, we also direct the Clerk of the Court not to accept any further petitions for extraordinary writs from petitioner unless he pays the docketing fee…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. In Re SindramSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. In Re DemosSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. In Re SassowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Melvin P. Deutsch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Support Systems International, Inc. v. Richard MackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Carr v. TilleryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Clovis Carl Green., Jr. v. Honorable Edward W. Nottingham, District Judge Honorable Richard M. Borchers, Magistrate JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States of America, Ex Rel. Todd Verdone, Pro Per v. Circuit Court for Taylor County, in the Matter of Todd VerdoneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API