Legal Opinion

Columbus Merchandise Co. v. Kline

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 1, 1917PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of George W. Kline, bankrupt. On review of order of referee denying claim of. International. Harvester Company of America, to certain property.

1Opinion of the Court

SATER, District Judge.

The International Harvester Company (hereinafter called the vendor) and the defendant, Kline, as vendee, on October 12, 1912, entered into a contract of conditional sale for certain farming implements which were delivered to the vendee. On October 24, 1913, he gave his note for their price. A series of other like contracts were entered into in the years 1913 and 1914 under each of which like property was delivered to Kline, who was engaged *297in the business, inter alia, of selling farming implements, and at the settlement made with him by the vendor, towards the end of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Potter Mfg. Co. v. ArthurCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  2. Cincinnati Equipment Co. v. DegnanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  3. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. WitmireCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  4. Hamilton v. David C. Beggs Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1910

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Raeuber v. Central National BankDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1953
  2. Rollman & Sons Co. v. Alaska Realty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. In re Chinese Temple Restaurant Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1931
  4. National Bank of Bellows Falls v. Vermont Packing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  5. Voss v. SlaytonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API