People v. Perry

On Remand

Before: Danhof, C.J., and J. H. Gillis and Bronson, JJ. Per Curiam.

By order of the Supreme Court dated March 9, 1983, we are required to reconsider this case in light of People v Gonzales, 415 Mich 615; 329 NW2d 743 (1982).

In our earlier decision in this case, People v Perry, 115 Mich App 533; 321 NW2d 719 (1982), we did not directly address the issue concerning whether the introduction of testimony of a witness whose memory had been hypnotically refreshed constituted reversible error. Instead, we noted that the issue had been addressed in her codefendant’s appeal which we had…