People v. Guerra
California Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceKaus, J.
I concur.
In light of the facts related in the majority opinion, there is a substantial possibility that the victim’s testimony on penetration was “confabulated” in the police-conducted hypnosis session, and, given the unreliability of that evidence, I do not think that the rape convictions can stand. To the extent that the Shirley decision embodies the principle that testimony “created” in this type of hypnosis session is not sufficiently reliable to be admitted in a criminal trial, I agree that it establishes a rule that goes to the heart of the accuracy of the factfinding process and should…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Robison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
- Commonwealth v. KaterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.