Legal Opinion

Boyce v. Early-Stratton Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 10, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHeiskell, J.

This is a suit for fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) damages for the malicious and wilful suing out of an attachment. The declaration alleged that the defendant, Early-Stratton Company through its attorney, maliciously and wilfully sued out an original attachment in the court of R. C. Strehl, Justice of the Peace, against C. R. Boyce; that pursuant to the attachment the plaintiff’s account and collateral at the Union & Planters Bank & Trust Company of Memphis, Tennessee, were tied up for several days and that the plaintiff’s credit was greatly injured and their business injured as a result…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. ConnorsTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Trentman v. WileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Morgan v. DuffyTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State ex rel. Clifford v. BeldsmeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  5. Morgan v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1803

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tennessee Publishing Co. v. FitzhughTennessee Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API