Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. George

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 17, 1986No. 85-1622PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

793 F.2d 264

George HERNANDEZ, Pete Sandoval, David Bohks, and Steve H.

Montoya, on behalf of themselves and all others

similarly situated,

Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross- Appellees,

and

Robert DeMary, Plaintiff,

v.

James GEORGE, in his capacity as sheriff of Otero County;

William Mershon, Roy Tucker, Jr., and Clarence Griffin, in

their capacity as commissioners of the County of Otero; and

The County of Otero, Defendants-Appellees/Cross- Appellants.

Nos. 85-1622, 85-1652.

United States Court of Appeals,

Tenth Circuit.

June 17, 1986.

As Amended July 17, 1986.

Antonio V. Silva, Rallis, Silva & Silva, P.C., El…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  2. John H. Smith v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  3. Martha Johnson and Delores J. Ceballos, Etc. v. University College of the University of Alabama in Birmingham George W. Campbell, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Prandini v. National Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. Hernandez v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Case v. Unified School District No. 233Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. Roth v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. Monahan v. New York City Department Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  4. McInnis v. Fairfield Communities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. Nalder v. West Park HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API