Legal Opinion

Bottaro v. Schoenborn

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 20, 1968PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.

The plaintiff, while walking on a public highway, was struck and injured by an automobile owned and driven by the defendant. He brought this action to recover damages and, among his claims of negligence, alleged, in an inept way, the doctrine of supervening negligence. There is no denial, however, that the issue was in the case. The defendant pleaded a special defense of contributory negligence. The parties acknowledge that the court adequately and correctly charged the jury on both of these issues. The discussion of contributory negligence, however, appears at two points in the charge. In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Intelisano v. GreenwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  2. Annes v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Montagna v. JewellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Labatt v. GrunewaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. State v. FletcherConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  3. MacK v. ClinchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  4. DePaola v. SeamourSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Smith v. ChardakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API