Legal Opinion

Smith v. Chardak

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1981No. 1216PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This action of trespass arises out of injuries suffered by Margaret Smith, appellant, when struck by the vehicle driven by Sherre Chardak, appellee. The jury returned a verdict for the appellee. 1 Appellant’s motion for a new trial was denied and she filed this appeal arguing solely that the court’s charge to the jury was in error. We agree and order a new trial.

Where the accuracy of a charge is in issue, an appellate court must look to the charge in its entirety against the background of evidence in order to determine whether or not error was committed and whether that error…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Bentivoglio v. RalstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. MulgrewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Costa v. LairSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. In Re Estate of FickertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. DelcomicoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Staymates v. ITT Holub IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Laniecki v. Polish Army Veterans Ass'n of Lucyan ChwalkowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Spearing v. StarcherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API