Goodenow v. Barnes
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Glinton Distriot Oourt ActioN in chancery to compel the specific performance of a contract for the sale of lands by defendant to plaintiff. After a trial upon tbe merits, plaintiff’s petition was dismissed; be now appeals to tbis court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
Plaintiff bad certain negotiations, verbally and by letter, witb tbe agent of defendant, for tbe purchase of tbe land involved in tbis action, which were protracted through many weeks. One Marsh was requested by tbe agent to call upon plaintiff, and ascertain tbe precise terms proposed by him in a letter, which were not fully understood. Tbe result of tbe interview Marsh communicated to tbe agent. Thereupon tbe following correspondence was bad between tbe agent and defendant, tbe first of tbe letters being written by tbe agent, a brother of defendant, who, at tbe time, resided in Term out.
“…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Batie v. AllisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Sargent & Co. v. HeggenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Coad v. RogersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Jameson v. Joint Drainage District No. 3Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Des Moines Marble & Mantel Co. v. SeeversSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.