Legal Opinion
Union Oil Co. v. Pillsbury
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 7, 1933No. 6992PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Circuit Judge.
Appeal from a decree dismissing a bill to annul and enjoin enforcement of an award to Preller under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 44 Stat. 1424, c. 509 (33 USCA §§ 901-950).
On the Montebello’s arrival in port from a voyage during which Preller was employed as third officer, he was paid off. Thereafter he was re-engaged, not as an officer or sailor, but as a night watchman on the vessel and only while she was undergoing overhauling which ordinarily lasted but a few days. His duties consisted in patrolling and guarding the ship' and in seeing to it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. KierejewskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- John Baizley Iron Works v. SpanSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Alaska Packers Ass'n v. Industrial Accident CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Sultan Railway & Timber Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- De Wald v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Hawn v. American S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Diomede v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Seneca Washed Gravel Corporation v. McManigalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.