State v. Jarrell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Defendants first contend that the trial court erred in overruling their objections to testimony of Officer Cobb as to the reasons the police were maintaining surveillance of the restroom. Cobb testified that he and other officers had received numerous complaints concerning “acts being committed in the men’s bathroom.” Defendants contend that this testimony, admitted over objection, was irrelevant on the issue of their guilt and had the sole effect of creating prejudice against them in the minds of the jurors. In this connection we note initially that in the testimony complained…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. TriggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Bielicki v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Britt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Joseph L. Smayda and Wendell H. Gunther v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Neville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Young v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Cowles v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. BloomMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Cowles v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.