Legal Opinion

Styles v. F. R. Long Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 24, 1902PublishedCited by 12 opinions

On error to the Passaic Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*414The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Pitney, J.

The action was in tort, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while crossing a temporary foot-bridge alleged to have been erected, controlled and maintained by the defendant over the Passaic river, at Main street, in Paterson.

The verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff. The assignment of errors relates solely to the proceedings at the trial.

From the bill of exceptions it appears that the plaintiff introduced in evidence a contract, under seal, made before the occurrence in question, between the defendant and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. Clinton Water Works Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  2. Nickerson v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1878
  3. Jordan v. LavertySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Miller v. MuscarelleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Larson v. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. O'Brien v. American Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Solberg v. SchlosserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Pittsfield Cottonwear Manufacturing Co. v. Pittsfield Shoe Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API