Legal Opinion

Ziemak v. Schnakenberg

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 31, 2005No. 2 CA-CV 2004-0088PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, J.

¶ 1 Plaintiff/app ellant Susan Ziemak appeals the trial court’s award of attorney fees and costs in favor of defendant/appellee, Larry Schnakenberg. She maintains that the trial court erred when it denied her motion for additur and declined to include jury fees and prejudgment interest in her trial judgment which, as a result, fell short of exceeding her arbitration award by twenty-five percent pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-133(I) and Rule 76, Ariz. R. Civ. P., 16 A.R.S., Pt. 2. We hold that the trial court did not err when it declined to consider jury fees in that calculation,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. O'Malley Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  5. Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hourani v. Benson HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. Abdulkadir Hourani v. Benson HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API