Legal Opinion

Merlin Godstone v. David Pedro; Christopher Scarr; D. Bevan; Bobby Rabb; B. Hill; and Samantha Hoisington

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 14, 2026No. 2:24-cv-00853Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MERLIN GODSTONE, Case No.: 2:24-cv-00853-AN Plaintiff, v. OPINION AND ORDER DAVID PEDRO; CHRISTOPHER SCARR; D. BEVAN; BOBBY RABB; B. HILL; and SAMANTHA HOISINGTON, Defendants. Plaintiff Merlin Godstone brings claims pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1983

for alleged violations of their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights by defendants, employees of Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution (“EOCI”). Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment, which is fully briefed, and the Court finds that oral argument will not assist it in…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API