Estes F. Bright v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSEN, Chief Judge.
The McNabb case (McNabb v. United States), 318 U.S. 332, 63 S.Ct. 608, 87 L.Ed. 819, held that incriminating statements elicited from one in custody, during unnecessary delay in taking him before a United States Commissioner, may not be received as evidence to convict.
This represents a procedural prescription laid down by the Supreme Court, under its “supervisory authority over the administration of criminal justice in the federal courts” (318 U.S. at page 341, 63 S.Ct. at page 613), and is without relation to whether the circumstances of obtaining the statement may make…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Edgar Lee Shobe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Marc Sol Kaplan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
3Cited by15 opinions
- William Lee Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Judson Edgar Holt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Larry C. Glouser v. United States of America, Raymond P. Gearhart, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Dawson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- United States v. Francis A. KeebleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.