Legal Opinion

Smith v. Charlotte Electric Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 9, 1917PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Justice, J., at September Term, 1916, of MECKLENBURG.

1Opinion of the Court

Clare, 0. I.

This is an action for tbe wrongful death of the plaintiff’s intestate, Charles B. Skipper, who was run over and killed by defendant’s car on College Street, Charlotte, on the night of 25 December, 1913.

Without discussing the other evidence alleged as negligence, it is sufficient to consider the evidence in regard to the fender used by defendant, for if that evidence is true — and it must be taken as true on this appeal — the judgment of nonsuit was erroneous.

There was evidence tending to show that the deceased was lying on his back across the track, as his legs and lower part of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pickett v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Lloyd v. Albemarle & Raleigh R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Henderson v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Witsell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. Greenlee v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pickett v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Hinnant v. Tidewater Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Treadwell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Hudson v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Lea v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API