Legal Opinion

Public Utility District No. 1 v. Girard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1939No. 27309. Department TwoPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Action in this case was instituted by plaintiffs for the purpose of compelling the defendant Joseph Girard, treasurer of Wahkiakum county, to pay warrants issued by public utility district No. 1, of that county, out of funds received from taxes levied by the district.

Trial was had to the court. After the trial was concluded, findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment were entered favorable to plaintiffs. The find ings and conclusions were filed June 1, 1938, and judgment was signed and entered June 11, 1938.

The record discloses that no appeal bond was given as provided by Rem. Rev.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walker v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Surety Finance Co. v. PrinzWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Anderson v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. In Re the Estate of UmphreyWashington Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peddicord v. LieserWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Napier v. RunkelWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State Ex Rel. Fleming v. CohnWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Wyback v. Board of Prison Terms & ParolesWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Ludwick v. WebbWashington Supreme Court · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API