Legal Opinion

In Re Fisher

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 1, 1996No. 19-05681PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

EUGENE R. WEDOFF, Bankruptcy Judge.

The motion now before the court raises the question of what property, if any, remains in a Chapter 13 estate after plan confirmation. Under its Municipal Code, the City of Chicago is authorized to take prescribed action against illegally parked cars. The debtor here, Rachel Fisher, asserts in the pending motion that by taking this action against her car, after she had filed a ease under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code (Title 11, U.S.C.), the city violated Section 362(a)(3) of the Code. That provision, part of the Code’s automatic…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Public Citizen v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. Fisher (In Re Fisher)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  2. In Re BatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
  3. Strong v. United States Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (In Re Strong)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  4. Annese v. Kolenda (In Re Kolenda)District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
  5. In Re Resource Technology Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API